Category Archives: Groovy

Writing Java Performance Tests in Groovy

In my previous post, I mentioned writing performance tests anytime you need to do optimization to slow areas of code. Writing effective performance tests can be tedious in Java. Every test you want to run in Java needs to have the same timing logic before and after the tests. Groovy‘s Closures make separating timing code from actual test implementations easy. I write all my performance tests in groovy because it simplifies the testing code logic and allows me to focus on what I am trying to test.

The basics of a performance test is to get the current time before the test, run the test and then get the time after. In Groovy, we can use a closure to express this.

def timeit = {String message, Closure cl->
    def startTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
    def deltaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime
    println "$message: \ttime: $deltaTime" 

This allows you to call a test like this:

timeit("Test 1") {
    // This would be the code you want to test
    Math.pow(2, 6)

If you are going to be writing many tests, this format is much shorter than having to constantly repeat the currentTimeMillis() calls in Java. Also, no heavyweight testing framework is required. The ‘message’ that is passed in is a convience method so the output of the test can be distinguished. The results look like this:

Test 1: 	time: 0

Right away you will notice that a time of 0 milliseconds is not that useful. The code simply ran too fast to measure. Yes we could use nanoseconds and may get better results. What I prefer to do is to run the test many many time and to take the average. This way you get an average of how fast it is and it provides more repeatable numbers.

Updating the groovy closure, we end up with the following that runs the test 500 times.

def timeit = {String message, int count=500,  Closure cl->
    def startTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
    count.times { cl() }
    def deltaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime
    def average = deltaTime / count
    println "$message:\tcount: $count \ttime: $deltaTime \taverage: $average" 

The output of this looks like this:

Test 2:	count: 500 	time: 18 	average: 0.036

Another thing that should be considered in Java is discounting the first few runs. The first time Java executes a particular class, things are always slower. Some work has to be done by the Java VM to load all of the classes for the first time. Subsequent invocations of the same code get faster. To account for this, I include a warming period in the tests. Essentially I run the code to be testing a bunch of times before I record the time. This discards these initial runs that will be slower. The closure for this looks like this:

def timeit = {String message, int count=500, Closure cl->
    // Warming period
    20.times { cl() }
    def startTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
    count.times { cl() }
    def deltaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime
    def average = deltaTime / count
    println "$message:\tcount: $count \ttime: $deltaTime \taverage: $average" 

The output of this looks like this:

Test 3:	count: 500 	time: 6 	average: 0.012

Another thing you might want to do is to run a multi-threaded test. In Java, this would require quite a few extra classes. In groovy, a simple modification to this closure can allow it to be run in multiple threads. Here is the new closure and test call calling it with 5 separate threads:

def timeit = {String message, int numThreads=1, int count=500, Closure cl->
    // Warming period
    20.times { cl() }
    def startTime = System.currentTimeMillis()
    count.times {
        def threads = []
        numThreads.times { threads << new Thread(cl as Runnable) }
    def deltaTime = System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime
    def average = deltaTime / count
    println "$message:\tcount: $count \ttime: $deltaTime \taverage: $average" 

timeit("Test 4", 5) {
    Math.pow(2, 6)

An extra parameter to the timeit closure allows you to pass the number of threads to concurrently execute. The results are the following:

Test 4:	count: 500 	time: 465 	average: 0.93

As you can see, groovy makes it much easier to write performance tests for Java code. The closure listed above can be used in all sorts of different projects to test performance. Hopefully this snippet will make your life easier when it comes to writing your own performance tests.

Maritime Dev Con 2010 Followup

The Maritime Dev Con was a huge success. About 95 people total attended the event making it a huge success for developers in the Maritimes. I had a great time at the event and met a bunch of really cool people.

The presentations I gave went well with a number of attendees. I’m putting up the slides from the presentation here in case you want to review them.

I’m also going to include the sample code from the presentations. The samples was for the modern hello world example in Java and Groovy. It used the twitter API to query MaritimeDevCon from twitter to find my ‘Hello World’ tweet.

Modern Java Development

Slides: MaritimeDevCon2010 – Java Jumpstart

package com.chrisdail.monctondevcon;

import java.util.List;
import twitter4j.*;

public class ModernHelloWorld {
    public static void main(String[] args) throws TwitterException {
        Twitter twitter = new TwitterFactory().getInstance();
        Query query = new Query("MaritimeDevCon");
        List<Tweet> tweets =;
        for (Tweet tweet : tweets) {
            System.out.println(tweet.getFromUser() + ": " + tweet.getText());

Groovy Primer

Slides: MaritimeDevCon2010 – Groovy Primer

import twitter4j.*

def twitter = new TwitterFactory().instance Query("MaritimeDevCon")).tweets.each {
    println "$it.fromUser: $it.text"

Maritime DevCon 2010

There is going to be a maritime developers conference coming up on June 18th in Moncton. It is going to be a great opportunity to have developers from Moncton and other areas of the maritimes get together and learn a bit about other languages and technologies they might not have been exposed to. All of the presentations are limited to 45 min and will mostly give an introduction to the language or technology.

Information about the DevCon can be found here:

I will be giving two presentations at this conference.

  • Modern Java Development – In this presentation I’m going to give an introduction to Java for non-Java developers. It will cover the basics of knowing where to start and getting started.
  • Groovy Primer – This is essentially going to be a rehash of the Groovy talk I gave at the Maritime Java User’s Group a month or so ago. This will focus on showing what Groovy has to offer (particularly to Java developers) and how to get started with Groovy.

Hope to see you there!

Introduction to Groovy Talk

Last night I gave a talk at the Maritimes Java User Group in Moncton. The presentation was an introduction to Groovy for Java Developers. I had initially done a 3h internal course for iWave Software to bring them up to speed on what Groovy is and why we should use it. I took this course and cut the size down a bit (about 1h 15min + questions) for the presentation last night.

It was a great third event for the Maritimes JUG in Moncton. We ended up with a few less people than we hoped but everything learned something and had a good time. In case you missed the talk or want a review, I have made the slides used for this presentation available.

Subversion Merge Change-log in 10 lines of Groovy

Problem. Bugs happen. The common solution to this problem is to fix the bug and release a patch. Version 1.0 has bugs, version 1.0.1 fixes those bugs.

Inevitably at some point in time you will need to put together a list of all of the changes in a release. For me, this needs to go into a format we can post on our wiki. This process can be tedious if it is a manual process. There are a few approaches to handling this. You can go against the bug tracking repository and look for what bugs were fixed for this release. This will tell you everything that should have changed. I say ‘should have’ here because you cannot know for sure if the information is 100% accurate.

The other option is to go to the version control repository for information on what has change. This is the authoritative source of what has changed but often contains more information than what you would want in a change-log.

In my previous post on version control I mentioned that we have best practices around format for commit messages. All bugs start with the words “Bug

  • The ‘–xml’ option is used to format the output as XML. This allows groovy to break it down easily.
  • The ‘-g’ option is used which shows log messages from other revisions that were merged onto this branch. Let’s say you have 50 bugs that are merged onto the bug fix branch all at once. This would create a single revision on the branch. Using this option includes all 50 comments from their original commit on the trunk. This detail we want in the change-log. This gives nested entries though so the code has to handle that case.
  • The ‘-r’ option is used to specify the revision range to use. In this case for a branch, we want from the previous release revision number to the current (or HEAD). For this example, let’s assume the 1.0 branch was at revision 1528.
  • The command to run then becomes:

    svn log -r HEAD:1528 -g --xml

    The next step that needs to be done is to take this XML and turn it into a change-log. I plan to use this as a comment into a wiki so I prefix the lines with ‘*’ so they will appear as a bulleted list in trac. It also puts the revision number at the end of the line in brackets. The output should look like this:

     * Bug 123: Fixed some bug (1554)
     * Bug 126: Some other issue (1588)
     * Bug 322: Fixed the thing (1600)

    To generate this changelog, I wrote a groovy script. It uses the svn command to generate the changelog and uses Groovy’s XML Parsing to break it up and format it. The path to the working directory and revision number would change from release to release but the rest of the code is reusable.

    def handleEntry
    handleEntry = {entry->
        def message = entry.msg.text()
        if (message.size() >= 3 && message[0..2].equalsIgnoreCase("bug")) {
            println " * $message (${entry.@revision})"
    def proc = "svn log -r HEAD:1528 -g --xml".execute(null, new File("/path/to/working/directory"))
    new XmlParser().parseText(proc.text).logentry.each(handleEntry)

    Groovier Integration with Third Party Systems

    A lot of the work I do deals with integration with a third party system. Each of these systems typically has their own API and mechanisms for handling errors. Often times writing some code to ‘wrap’ the API is required to make it easier to use from an application. Many times this ends up being an ‘adapter’ from the third-party API format to something more manageable and familiar to the application you are writing.

    If you write this sort of thing in Java, you usually end up having a lot of duplicate code, specifically around error handling, that is hard to reuse without a lot of extra code. Lately, I have been using Groovy to solve these sorts of problems. The rest of the post shows a few ways I have learned to use Groovy to solve these problems in a better way. The result is simpler, more readable code.

    Groovy Closures for Error Handling

    Have you ever written this around a few methods?

    try {
        // Some code in here
    catch (APIException e) {
        log.error(e.getMessage(), e);
        throw new WrappedException(e);
    finally {
        // cleanup here

    Using Groovy’s Closures, this can be written as a single closure to do the error handling. Doing error handling this way is much simpler and allows the code to be reused easily.

    // Definition of error handling closure
    def errorHandling = { Closure c ->
        try {
        catch (Exception e) {
            log.error(e.getMessage(), e);
            throw new WrappedException(e)
        finally {
            // cleanup here
    // Code with error handling
    errorHandling {
        // Some Code in here

    For those not familiar with Groovy’s closures, let me explain what is happening here. The errorHandling variable is defined as a closure and is invoked around the code. This closure in turn takes a closure (function or code block in other languages) as a parameter. The error handling routine provides the stock error handling through the standard try catch syntax. Inside the try block, it invokes the closure that the user passed in. This allows the same error handling logic to be reused with the code to run being dynamically provided by the caller.

    Groovy Categories for Mapping

    Another problem is adapting between types in your application and types in the third party application. This is further complicated when dealing with collections of objects. Consider the following Java code to map from one system to another:

    // Assumes some object instance 'util' is provided to map between object types.
    // Given an input of InternalObject internal
    List<InternalObject> list = new ArrayList<InternalObject>();
    List<ExternalObject> results = api.operation(util.mapToExternal(input);            
    for (ExternalObject o: results) {
    return list;

    Instead of defining mappings as methods in some utility class, Groovy categories can be used to provide a more readable syntax.

    // Category definition
    class MappingCategory {
        static List<InternalObject> toInternalList(List<ExternalObject> o) {
            o.collect { toInternal(it) }
        static InternalObject toInternal(ExternalObject from) {
             // Map from External to Internal
        static ExternalObject toExternal(InternalObject from) {
             // Map from Internal to External
    // Code using the category. Input object is 'input'
    use (MappingCategory) {

    The groovy category essentially adds dynamic methods to both the InternalObject and ExternalObject. The definition of the category has static methods which take one or more parameters. The first parameter is the class that the method should be added to. When the new method is invoked, the object it is invoked on is always added as the first parameter.

    Also being used here is the list ‘collect’ method. This replaces what needed to be done in Java with creating a new list, looping over each item, converting it and adding it to the new list. The collect method does this in a single step by using a closure that converts the object to a new format. The result is a new list with the objects in the new format but in a single line of code.

    Putting it all Together

    Using this category can also be combined with the error handling closure that was previously introduced. Consider the following updated version of the error handling closure.

    // Definition of error handling closure
    def errorHandling = { Closure c ->
        try {
            use (MappingCategory) {
        catch (Exception e) {
            log.error(e.getMessage(), e);
            throw new WrappedException(e)
        finally {
            // cleanup here

    With the previously defined error handling closure and category to handle the mappings, we can finally create a very minimal and readable adapter between our system and the third party system. Consider the following operation that uses the third party API. The input and output takes objects in the internal format.

    public List<InternalObject> operation(InternalObject internal) throws WrappedException {
        errorHandling {
            return api.execute(internal.toExternal()).toIncidentList()

    Groovy’s closures allow error handling to be defined more easily and centralized in a single location where the code can be reused. Groovy’s categories allow data transformations to be done in a more readable fashion. The result is code that is easier to read and use.

    SpringOne2gx 2009 Post Mortem

    I had the privilege of attending the SpringOne2gx conference this year in New Orleans. This is the first tech conference I have attended. Where I live, in Moncton, is a bit off the beaten path and is a bit far to travel to these types of conferences regularly. Past employers of mine have not always invested in their developers as much as they should. Thankfully, iWave Software was able to send me this year.

    I had an excellent time at the conference and met a lot of smart and equally minded developers. There was plenty of great content at the conference and the Roosevelt hotel in New Orleans was a great place to host the conference. The food was amazing the the service top notch. On a whole the conference was a great experience.

    For me, I made a Smörgåsbord of the conference taking a bit for all of the tracks that were provided. In the rest of this post I would like to cover some details on the plethora of technologies on display. Most of them were from SpringSource, the commercial company that backs the Spring technologies. There was a lot of great stuff but some of it I am a bit more skeptical on. The following are purely my opinions on what I saw. I am by no means an expert on any of these technologies but I do want to give you my first impressions of these from the perspective of a Software Developer and Architect working in the Enterprise IT space.

    Spring Framework 3.0
    One of the main focuses of the conference was the upcoming Spring Framework 3.0 release. Beyond just the framework itself, many of the other technologies leveraged some of the new 3.0 features. RC2 of the release should be available shortly. I would like to touch a bit on the feature set and particularly what excites me.

    • Spring Expression Language (SpEL) – This is one of the coolest new parts to the framework. A new expression language can be used to evaluate expressions related to other beans. In simple cases you can use something like #{refBean.value} in either the value attribute on a property or in the annotation directly. More complex expressions are also supported. This will be able to simplify configuration a great deal.
    • @Configuration – This is a rework of the Spring JavaConfig project that allows you to write your spring configurations in Java code directly. This project is now merged into the Spring framework 3.0. This feature did not excite me a whole lot. It seemed like something ‘cool’ but not something I would likely use. The main benefits of using this over XML were explained to be for refactoring, strong typing and losing the verbosity of XML. The refactoring and strong typing is less of an issue if you are using the Spring IDE (or STS) since it does all of that for you and even shows you where errors are. As for the syntax, I found the @Configuration to be clunky and still pretty verbose. If I wanted to express beans in code that are more readable, I would just use the Grails SpringBeanBuilder.
    • Java 5+ – Spring Framework 3.0 will be Java 5 and higher only. This is a great thing because it means that the core framework will fully support generics. All of the core libraries have been updated for this. In the past I stayed away from the JpaTemplate and other Spring libraries because the lack of generics made them more verbose than what I could write in wrappers of my own.
    • Task Executors – All of the scheduling stuff and executors were refactored. The Java 5 until.concurrent package is now used instead of the spring wrappers that they had. Also, scheduling is supported as part of Spring now. So for simple scheduling jobs (including cron), only spring will be required. This is nice since it is a common thing that is needed and Quartz is pretty heavy for this simple feature.
    • Rest Support – Spring Framework MVC now supports Rest. If you are an Spring MVC developer, this is very nice since you will be able to do REST directly from a @Controller method. If you are not using Spring MVC, there is no reason to look into this. The JAX-RS (JSR-311) spec is the way all of the other Java REST frameworks are going. I don’t see any reason to use this custom syntax over the standard for Rest unless you are using Spring MVC.
    • OXM – The Spring WS project created a bunch of stuff for handling Object to XML Mapping (OXM). Basically this is ORM for XML instead of a database. JAXB is one of the most popular frameworks for this and it is built in to the JVM. The OXM from Spring WS is now part of the core framework and allows anyone to have a single binding interface that can delegate to anyone of the many OXM frameworks out there including JAXB, XmlBeans, JiBX and Castor. This would be very nice for someone who wanted to support many different binding types but didn’t want to have to write all of that from scratch.

      On a whole the Spring Framework 3.0 release looks solid. I am going to have to grab the RC and check it out.

      Spring Roo
      Spring Roo was one of the technologies being shown at the conference. I had heard of it before but did not really do much digging into what it was. In a nutshell, it is a coding by convention framework for building applications (mostly web) in Java. Similar to Rails or Grails, it provides a console based utility to create entity beans (model), controllers and views. Instead of taking the dynamic language approach, Aspect J is used to merge common tools and scaffolding into the Java beans you create. It is a very cool product especially if you don’t have the luxury of using dynamic languages.

      One of the more impressive aspects of this was the console they created. The console was intelligent and had full auto-complete support. I would like to see other console based applications use this type of thing in the future.

      I played around with this a bit. It worked well for what it did. It will likely be used mostly for rapid prototyping. I think if I had to do a new web project, I would probably just do it in grails since I am already comfortable with Groovy. This would be great for people learning Java or with a need to rapidly prototype something in Java using Spring. Also, it saves the hassle of setting up things like JPA and MVC. Once the scaffolding is in place, you can customize it how you need.

      SpringSource Tool Suite 2.2 (STS for short)
      The SpringSource Tool Suite is an eclipse based development environment for all things Spring. It includes the old Spring IDE capabilities for editing spring XML files, support for Spring Roo, Groovy, Grails and Maven. The whole package works very well (except for the fact that the 2.2 release did not include the groovy plugin).

      Not much is really new here. I had been using the Spring IDE and Groovy plugins already. Most of the components are available standalone. This will be very useful for people who don’t have any of these plugins and provides a single download.

      The main focus of the IDE was centered around delpoying to dm Server and tc Server, both of which are included. The new Groovy plugin is great and has greatly improved over the last little while. It is available standalone which is probably how I will use it for now as I don’t have a need for many of the other features at this time.

      Spring Integration
      Spring Integration is like an ESB inside a single JVM. It seemed like a good project if you had a need for this type of thing. For me, I see the crossing JVM boundaries (clustering) one of the most important aspects of an ESB and this does nothing to tackle that problem. The samples that were presented showed how the integration could be done with OSGi. The capabilities were there but the configurations were very verbose and required writing some code in places for filters and other such things. I kept thinking how much easier it would be to just do these things in code directly and they would be a whole lot simpler. Thread Pools are so much easier now with Java’s util.concurrent and dynamic languages do routing really well. Both of those I am comfortable with. I think this project still has a long way to go before it can truly compete with an ESB type product.

      Spring Batch
      Spring Batch was shown alongside Spring Integration for handling large batch operations. The framework looked good and provided a lot of monitor capabilities around the status of the batches.

      SpringSource tc Server
      tc Server is SpringSource’s enterprise version of Tomcat. Essentially they took standard Tomcat and wrapped it with better monitoring and clustered deployment capabilities. This looks like a great solution for services type companies who want to deploy to a more enterprise version of Tomcat. For a products company though, it may be more difficult to manage since it is a commercial product. Most customers I have encountered either want to use their millions of dollars JEE environment or expect you to provide your own.

      SpringSource tc Server Developer Edition
      The Developer Edition of tc Server was announced at this conference. The main feature included here was called Spring Insight. This is a very cool tool targeted at application developers. It provides real time monitoring of an application that gives developers information about what is going on in the application. It includes health information, performance and the ability to drill down on web requests to see each call. Even SQL queries being run are shown from this console.

      Everything is done through AOP runtime weaving so no code changes are required to run in this environment. Also, having this free for developers means developers will have a great environment for analyzing the performance of their applications. This is definitely something to check out for anyone who has a .war application.

      SpringSource dm Server
      SpringSource dm Server is Spring’s OSGi server. Similar to tc Server, this is an enterprise grade OSGi Server. They provide a lot of features to make OSGi easier including being able to deploy a standard .war file to the server and have it run.

      OSGi is ready for prime time and has proven to be. It is definitely not one size fits all though. It is not something you just use because you can or because it is cool. The demos of dm Server and OSGi with Spring with littered with caveats and workarounds. OSGi is a great platform but still has a lot of pitfalls for application developers. Yes it has some cool things you can do with dependencies and versioning but they are not free.

      I did not get into any of the Grails sessions. There were too many sessions I wanted to attend and I have already had some exposure to Grails so I stayed away from these for the most part. On a whole, it seems like Grails has come a long way from a competitive web framework to one of the best ones out there. If I had a new web application project to do, I would be most likely to choose Grails to do it in.

      Griffon is one of the newer Groovy frameworks to come out. It provides a Coding by Convention framework for Swing development and is targeted for developing Rich Internet Applications. The core is based on the Grails and will likely be familiar for those who already have Grails projects. The framework is built around making MVC easy through Swing and use of data binding. I am really looking forward to digging into this more.

      The biggest hurdle I see is being able to leverage this technology in an existing application. One of our main products is a very large Swing based IDE. The code has been around for a long time and could benefit from newer patterns for GUI development. I would love to be able to integrate Griffon into it but at this time it may not be easy. I intend to look into this more to see if it is possible.

      This groovy language has also come a long way. I started using it when 1.0 was released. Since then it has really grown in capabilities. I learned a few tricks this time that I was not aware of. Most of them had to do with the annotations that were added in 1.6.

      The biggest thing for Groovy though was the IDE support. I love the groovy language but have found that I could write Java faster in many circumstances even though I write more than twice the amount of code. The reason is because of the IDE support. Code Completion, Import completion and Refactoring are huge. The new Groovy plugin for eclipse is fantastic and includes all of these. Finally, I feel I can switch to using Groovy as my primary development language on the JVM. This is also a big step toward convincing others of the benefits of Groovy.

    Changing Maven POM Versions With Groovy and XSLT

    One of the projects I am working on uses Apache Maven for doing builds. Usually, I let the Maven Release plugin take care of all of the version numbering. When I instruct maven to generate a release version or do a branch, it will ask for the new version for each of the artifacts in my project. The project I’m working on has about 15 different artifacts so switching the version numbers all of the time can take a bit of time. Allowing Maven to do this for me makes sense.

    This brings me to my latest problem. We needed to change the version of all of our Maven artifacts outside of a release. Instead of incrementing the minor release number we are preparing for a major release (1.x to 2.x). I could do the version change the brute force way but being a programmer, I have strong instincts that prevent me from doing a repeatable monotonous task. Am I lazy? A bit, but I like to call it being efficient. I would rather take an hour and write a small script to do the task for me than take 15 minutes on the brute force approach.

    What I needed to do was change all of the occurrences of 1.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in all of my pom.xml files. Not only does this need to change for the main artifact but also for any dependencies.


    My first attempt to write a script to do this was using Python. There were a few issues I ran into pretty quickly. I do not like most of the standard python libraries for XML parsing. The DOM library has the same issues as the Java DOM library. I just wanted a ‘simple’ XML library. So I decided to use the ElementTree library. I have used it in the past and it is very nice to use. I soon found that this would give me a few problems.

    • ElementTree does not support namespaces well. I wanted to use the findAll() method but it does not support namespaces.
    • Another thing I wanted to do is use full XPath. It is very simple to express finding all versions where the ../groupId = ‘mygroup’ in xpath. XPath seems better than writing this in code

    Because of these issues I quickly decided that Groovy may be a better language for this script. Groovy has great XML support using their XmlParser. I actually produced a fully working script using the XmlParser that did exactly what I needed. The only issue with it was that when you write out the XML from Groovy after it was parsed, it was not maintaining the original formatting. I did not want to have the entire formatting of my pom.xml files be changed just for a version change. So this lead me back to XSLT.

    I had done a lot of XSLT in my previous job and it really is the best tool for this kind of XML manipulations. It is very easy to preserve the original XML structure and make small modifications to it. The approach is to start with the standard identify stylesheet. This stylesheet essentially produces an exact copy of the original. From there you can add specializations to modify any things you need. Here is the identity stylesheet:

    <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="" version="1.0">
        <xsl:template match="@*|node()">
            <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>

    To this, I added a template to match the maven version number element where the ../groupId was the group I was concerned with and change the version number to what I desired.

        <xsl:template match="m:version[../m:groupId='com.chrisdail.project']">

    This 10 line XSLT did all of the processing on the pom.xml file I required. I wrapped this in a groovy script to walk the file tree and run it against all pom.xml files. This is the final script I came up with. It walks the tree for pom.xml files. For each file it finds any groups of com.chrisdail.project and replaces the version number with my new version number of 2.0.

    import javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory
    def xslt = '''
    <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="" version="1.0" xmlns="" xmlns:m="" exclude-result-prefixes="m">
        <xsl:template match="m:version[../m:groupId='com.chrisdail.project']">
        <xsl:template match="@*|node()">
            <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
    def processFile = {
        def file = new File(it, "pom.xml");
        if (file.isFile()) {
            println "Processing: $file"
            def writer = new StringWriter()
            def factory = TransformerFactory.newInstance()
            def transformer = factory.newTransformer(new StreamSource(new StringReader(xslt)))
            transformer.transform(new StreamSource(new FileReader(file)), new StreamResult(writer))
    file = new File("/path/to/root/dir")

    It did take a bit more time than changing all of the pom.xml files manually but it was much more satisfying.

    Using Groovy Templates and Filters Java

    I have written about the Groovy language a few times. It is a wonderful language and integrates seamlessly with Java. Recently, I have found that it can be very useful for templates and filters.

    Using Groovy for Filtering

    Consider an application where there are many events that fire on certain conditions. The Observer pattern is often used for these types of event handlers. Also consider that the user (not the developer) wants to restrict or filter out events so only the ones they want are fired by the handler. Essentially the user needs a filter language where they can express their business rules. This filter needs to exist outside of the regular codebase so the user can change it on the fly.

    Groovy solves this problem very neatly. Consider an Event class with the following properties:

    • severity
    • timesCalled
    • message

    Assume that an instance of this class is provided as the object ‘e’. In groovy we could express a filter script that takes events with a severity less than 2 or times called greater than 5 as the following:

    e.severity < 2 || e.timesCalled > 5

    The above script is pretty simple and is easily written by a technical savvy user. I have written a simple helper class that facilitates creating reusable scripts like our filter script. Here is the code:

    public class ReusableScript {
        private GroovyClassLoader gcl = new GroovyClassLoader(getClass().getClassLoader());
        private Class scriptClass = null;
        public void setScriptString(String scriptString) throws UnsupportedEncodingException {
            if (scriptString == null || scriptString.trim().equals("")) {
            InputStream in = new ByteArrayInputStream(scriptString.getBytes("UTF-8"));
            scriptClass = gcl.parseClass(new GroovyCodeSource(in, "Filter", ""));
        public Script newScript() throws Exception {
            if (scriptClass == null) {
                return null;
            return (Script) scriptClass.newInstance();

    To use this script to actually execute the filter, you would do something like this:

    // Creating the filter script. Assumes filterString is set by the user (I use spring for this)
    ReusableScript filter = new ReusableScript();
    // Typically this code would be running in the event handler. Assumes that an object e is available that is the event
    filterScript = filter.newScript();
    // Bind the 'e' object into the binding context of the script
    filterScript.setProperty("e", e);
    Object result =;
    if (result instanceof Boolean && ((Boolean) result).booleanValue() == true) {
        // The filter has passed.
        // ... Code that performs the operation

    Very little code is actually needed to put this together. The ReusableScript class can be used many times. The groovy code is only compiled once so performance is very good.

    Using Groovy for Templating

    A similar problem is the problem of templating. Consider an application that sends emails on error conditions. The user may wish to customize the email message that is sent out. They also may want to be able to use information from the application to provide meaning to the message. There are many template and expression languages available for Java. I have looked at using Apache Commons EL and Velocity. My main complaint on these languages is their complexity. It requires learning a new language syntax and integrating them often requires quite a bit of code. Let’s consider a more groovy solution.

    Using the same ReusableScript class as used for filtering, we can provide templating. Consider a data class called Event that contains the following properties:

    • message
    • detail
    • hostname

    Consider the following Groovy script that creates the body of an email message:

    """[$e.hostname] An error occurred: $e.reason

    This may produce a message that looks like this:

    [localhost] An error occurred: File not found: abc.txt
    FileNotFoundException ...

    This is essentially making use of Groovy’s Templates that are built in to the language. The template engine can be used by itself standalone, but this provides a simpler integration. The other benefit is the if more complicated logic is required beyond a simple template, actual groovy code can be written beyond the simple script. The script is a full groovy script and would allow you to essentially do anything from it.

    The template script would be loaded the same way as our previous filter script. This time instead of evaluating the script as a boolean, we get it as a string.

    // ... Setup of filter script ...
    Object result =;
    if (result instanceof String) {
        // Code that uses the string

    So that is two easy ways the Groovy can be used in a Java application to solve some of these simple problems.

    Building with Maven

    I’ve decided to use Apache Maven for building the code for my new project. So far I have had a love-hate relationship with Maven. If you don’t know what maven is, the folks over at Apache say Maven is …

    “… a software project management and comprehension tool. Based on the concept of a project object model (POM), Maven can manage a project’s build, reporting and documentation from a central piece of information.”

    Unfortunately that definition is about as vague as you can get so I will explain what Maven gives me and my project. This also happens to be the list of what I love about Maven:

    • Maven enforces a standardized project structure to all modules in a project.
    • Maven handles dependencies between libraries.
    • Maven builds all of my code and creates a distribution package.

    Essentially by using Maven, I can get all of these things without having to write and maintain ant scripts to do most of the work for me. Maven is not without its problems though.

    • Often times the number of lines of XML you need to write ends up to be just as complicated and long as an ant script to do the same thing.
    • I’ve found a lot of bugs particularly with the assembly module. It seems to include dependencies of modules that are set with the “compile” or “test” scope only.
    • The Groovy building plugin for maven does not yet work for Groovy 1.5.x.

    I still think using maven was a good choice for my project. It may have some qwerks but I think that I am further ahead than if I had to build everything from scratch.

    Using Maven to Generate a Build Number

    Earlier I metioned that I use the subversion revision number as a build number. This is actually quite easy to do from Maven. The following plugin descriptor provides you access to the subversion revision number using the ${scm.revision} property.


    Once you have access to the revision number, you can construct a build number using the product version and the revision number. I have added this build number to the Implementation-Version property of the jar manifest. The following plugin definition does this for me:


    The resulting manifest in the jar looks something like this:

    Manifest-Version: 1.0
    Archiver-Version: Plexus Archiver
    Created-By: Apache Maven
    Built-By: cdail
    Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_03
    Implementation-Version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT.93

    From Java code, this build number can be easily retrieved. The following code retrieves the Implementation-Version from the manifest:

    Package p = getClass().getPackage();
    String version = p.getImplementationVersion();

    The result is quite elegant but it takes a bit of work to get things into place. Like with many other things to do with Maven, it takes a while to figure out how to do what you want and you need to write a bunch of XML. Once that was done, everything fell into place. It is hard to say at this point if this is better or worse than the chunk of ant script I used to use to perform the same function.